We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Sonatype Repository Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."
"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."
"The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications."
"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the advanced features, user-friendly interface, and integration with other tools."
""The product is very good just the way it is; It has everything already well established and functions great. I can't see any way for this current version to be improved.""
"We use the solution for vulnerability assessment in respect of the application and the sites."
"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."
"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."
"Mitigating the issues and low confluence issues needs some improvement. Implementing demand with the ChatGPT under the web solution is an additional feature I would like to see in the next release."
"We wish that the Spider feature would appear in the same shape that it does in previous versions."
"The solution lacks sufficient stability."
"There were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."
"The use of system memory is an area that can be improved because it uses a lot."
"As with most automated security tools, too many false positives."
"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services."
"The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews while Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 31st in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6, while Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, GitHub, Black Duck and Snyk. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
