We performed a comparison between PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator."
"The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."
"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."
"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."
"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it."
"With the Extender Tab, if you know how to code then you can create a plugin and add it to Burp."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"We'd like to have more integration potential across all versions of the product."
"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."
"I need the solution to be more user-friendly. The solution needs to be user-friendly."
"Mitigating the issues and low confluence issues needs some improvement. Implementing demand with the ChatGPT under the web solution is an additional feature I would like to see in the next release."
"The solution doesn't offer very good scalability."
"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."
"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."
"BurpSuite has some issues regarding authentication with OAT tokens that need to be improved."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
