Quality Center vs Silk Central

Quality Center is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 25 reviews vs Silk Central which is ranked 19th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of Quality Center writes "Range of supported technology expands, but odd IDE design still leave newbies and pro users alike disappointed". The top reviewer of Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". Quality Center is most compared with IBM Rational Quality Manager, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite. Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM, Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise. See our Quality Center vs Silk Central report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Quality center vs. silk central report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs Silk Central and others in Test Management Tools.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Quality Center vs Silk Central

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ​It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers.HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models.The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only).For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Quality center vs. silk central report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs Silk Central and others in Test Management Tools.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
10,828
Comparisons
4,485
Reviews
25
Followers
1,133
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
1,459
Comparisons
523
Reviews
3
Followers
278
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Tricentislogo
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Quality Center competitors »
Micro focus logo
Compared 21% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Zephyr%20enterprise logo
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Silk Central competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsMicro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality CenterBorland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
OFFER
Learn more about Quality Center
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersQuality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
15%
Insurance Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Transportation Company
12%
Insurance Company
11%
No Data Available
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
19%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
9%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
80%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
63%
Quality center vs. silk central report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs Silk Central and others in Test Management Tools.
Download now
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email