We compared Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Rocky Linux based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is highly praised for its containerization capability, in-place upgrade ease, reliability, and scalability. Its comprehensive documentation, security features, and support services are valued by users. In contrast, Rocky Linux is commended for profitability, stability, and security, with seamless migration from other operating systems. Users appreciate its reliability, customer service, and compatibility with CentOS, although some recommend enhancements in system compatibility, user interface, startup times, package management, multimedia support, and customization options. Both operating systems offer favorable pricing, setup costs, and licensing terms, with RHEL delivering exceptional ROI, while Rocky Linux provides strong support and regular updates.
Features: The valuable features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) include containerization capability, in-place upgrade, reliability and stability, Podman and package management, copious documentation, longevity and stability, security features, SELinux, scalability and ease of setup, specification and technical guides. On the other hand, Rocky Linux is praised for its stability, reliability, security, long-term support, regular updates, ease of installation, intuitive user interface, compatibility with CentOS, and seamless migration process.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is reported to be straightforward and hassle-free, allowing for smooth implementation. On the other hand, users find the setup cost of Rocky Linux to be minimal, making the installation process smooth and hassle-free., The ROI from Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) was highly positive, with cost-effectiveness, scalability, and reliability highlighted. Rocky Linux also offered profitability, cost-effectiveness, enhanced productivity, impressive performance, and stability.
Room for Improvement: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has room for improvement in system compatibility, user interface, startup and shutdown times, package management, multimedia support, customization options, updates and upgrades transition, and documentation. Users have also provided feedback on areas where Rocky Linux could be enhanced.
Deployment and customer support: The user feedback indicates that the duration required to establish a new tech solution in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) involves separate phases such as deployment, setup, or implementation. However, in Rocky Linux, some users reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others mentioned spending a week for both., The customer service and support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) have been praised for their prompt and satisfactory assistance. Users appreciate the reliability and knowledge of the support team. The customer service of Rocky Linux receives positive remarks for its prompt assistance and helpfulness. Users commend the timely responses and expert guidance provided by the support staff. Overall, customers express satisfaction with Rocky Linux's customer service.
The summary above is based on 151 interviews we conducted recently with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Rocky Linux users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Management is portable and easily automated so deploying or installing packages and running updates is seamless."
"Because most databases run on Linux, that's what makes this solution so important. If you install a Unix system and want to use a database, you won't have to say, 'I can't find any database to run on this.'"
"It eases the burden by restricting the use of open-source Linux and preventing the development community from obtaining their own images. This is crucial for maintaining a secure supply chain and ensuring the lockdown of live Linux packages."
"We have support. If we have any issues with the distro, we can call their support team."
"The graphical user interface is useful. However, we prefer to use the command line as we can do many more things."
"We use RHEL in our infrastructure, which consists of VM and Linux. We use it to create clusters."
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux is very stable. It has been in the market for so many years, and it is used by large organizations."
"Red Hat support is pretty good. They're online, so you can look up things once you have support. Their AB integration has improved. It's easy to manage storage for moving, syncing LBM, etc."
"It's very simple to work with, easy to learn, and know where things are."
"It helps us keep our workstations in sync and ensures consistent settings across most of our machines."
"I haven't needed to use customer service or support, which speaks volumes about their product's reliability and ease of use."
"Continuous improvement is essential to enhance user experiences and address evolving needs."
"The graphical user interface should be more user-friendly. It's a concern because the command line is perfectly fine."
"This solution could be improved if it was easier to set up and run in cloud environments. It can also be costly to manage a large OpenShift environment."
"If they can make the integration with Ansible easier, that would be ideal."
"The numerous links to different pages disrupt the flow of information and make it difficult to maintain focus."
"The GUI has room for improvement. It needs to be managed by many administrators. It has basic command lines. They could improve it with better automation. We'd like to be able to create a script, and then have the ability to deploy it where we don't need to write everything manually. That part can be useful for automating."
"A targeted package tailored for small and medium-sized businesses can help increase business."
"From a cloud perspective, I'm looking for more integrations with native cloud services. For example, the ability to use native Azure Key Vault instead of Ansible Key Vault or Red Hat Key Vault."
"In terms of improvement, Rocky Linux needs to clarify its identity and target audience."
"The solution's audio integration for virtual machines could be improved."
"One of the potential issues is that if you don't pay for support, you may need to manage certain aspects on your own and rely on the community for assistance."
More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is ranked 1st in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 167 reviews while Rocky Linux is ranked 12th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 3 reviews. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is rated 8.8, while Rocky Linux is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) writes "Highly stable, good knowledge base, and reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rocky Linux writes "Very simple to work with, easy to learn, and has a competitive pricing". Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Windows Server, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows 10 and Oracle Solaris, whereas Rocky Linux is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Oracle Linux, openSUSE Leap, SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows 10. See our Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Rocky Linux report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
