• Home
  • RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. XM SendSecure [EOL]

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs XM SendSecure [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] and XM SendSecure [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We use it for on-premises hosting of web applications.
The deployment speed has been increased. We get accurate results when copying data.
Use XM SendSecure [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
RepliWeb
Video Not Available
OpenText
Overview
Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.

Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.

Sample Customers
Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while XM SendSecure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 8.2, while XM SendSecure [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] writes "Website code can be done by application owners". On the other hand, RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with , whereas XM SendSecure [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.