Entrust Identity Essentials vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Entrust Datacard Logo
79 views|68 comparisons
Thales Cloud Security Logo
1,810 views|1,578 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Entrust Identity Essentials and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Yubico, Fortinet and others in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
To learn more, read our detailed Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon.
Top Answer:The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365. That was the breaking point for us. The security is a little bit redundant because if you have already unlocked your phone… more »
Top Answer:We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud.
Ranking
Views
79
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
Views
1,810
Comparisons
1,578
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
406
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SMS PASSCODE
Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager
Learn More
Overview

Fast, cost effective multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution that lets Windows-based organizations realize a Zero Trust approach.

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Sample Customers
Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, AVEA, AZ Klina, Bashneft, BSR, Coop, Day Group, DEME, Digitale Gardemoen iks, Herbert Smith Freehills, Holstebro Kommune, Horten, Ikano, Intersport, JB Hifi, King Faisal special hospital and research center, Leaseplan, McDonald's, NSB, NZ Telecom, Orkla, Postnord, Rom Telecom, Slater and Gordon, Supercell, Transgrid, UPM, Widex
Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm14%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Yubico, Fortinet and others in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Entrust Identity Essentials is ranked 5th in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. Entrust Identity Essentials is rated 0.0, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". Entrust Identity Essentials is most compared with , whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and Utimaco SecurityServer.

We monitor all Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.