We performed a comparison between SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
