Compare Sentinel Dynamic vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive.""The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market.""It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Good static analysis and dynamic analysis.
Top Answer: Veracode is very, very expensive, one of the most expensive security scanning tools available. We pay an annual license… more »
Top Answer: The solution has issues with scanning. It tries to decode the binaries that we are trying to scan. It decodes the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

WhiteHat Sentinel delivers a proven, scalable, and affordable enterprise application security platform, accelerating the identification and remediation of Web application security vulnerabilities

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Offer
Keep your software secure

Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

Learn more about Sentinel Dynamic
Learn more about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
StreetCred Software, ReachLocal
IMDEX
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company10%
Consumer Goods Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Healthcare Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise49%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sentinel Dynamic is ranked 27th in Application Security while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 21st in Application Security with 2 reviews. Sentinel Dynamic is rated 0.0, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Good reporting and integration, but it needs a user-friendly dashboard". Sentinel Dynamic is most compared with SonarQube, OWASP Zap, WhiteSource, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Acunetix by Invicti, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Checkmarx and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.