We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete Mobile and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools."I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."
"The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful."
"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."
"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software."
"The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."
"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."
Earn 20 points
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is ranked 14th in Mobile App Testing Tools while TestObject is ranked 9th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is rated 8.0, while TestObject is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete Mobile writes "We are facing sometimes the situation when we have some issues with our automated tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestObject writes "Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation". SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is most compared with , whereas TestObject is most compared with .
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
