Sonatype Repository Firewall vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sonatype Logo
826 views|405 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Spirent Logo
185 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sonatype Repository Firewall and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you.""The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."

More Sonatype Repository Firewall Pros →

"CyberFlood is flexible.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function.""The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services.""The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."

More Sonatype Repository Firewall Cons →

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.""The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is reasonable if you're a large enterprise developing code. It's not super-expensive."
  • More Sonatype Repository Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security.
    Top Answer:The licensing is quite reasonable, I believe. I do see that it adds value. It means whatever part you want to use, you can just use that part and pay for that. I think the licensing is fair enough… more »
    Top Answer:The product helps with vulnerability and security assessment. It also helps with assessment at the configuration level.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    826
    Comparisons
    405
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    531
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    185
    Comparisons
    117
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sonatype Nexus Firewall, Nexus Firewall
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview

    Sonatype Repository Firewall is a cloud-based security solution designed to safeguard your software supply chain against malicious components. It operates by meticulously scanning and evaluating each new component against customized governance policies, thereby effectively identifying and blocking potential threats before they infiltrate your development pipeline. What sets Sonatype Repository Firewall apart is its user-friendly setup, seamless integration with existing workflows, and remarkable scalability, making it suitable for software development environments of any size. Key features include blocking malicious components through behavioral analysis, malware scanning, and vulnerability assessment, as well as the ability to enforce custom governance policies. By utilizing this tool, organizations can enhance their software supply chain security, mitigate risks related to supply chain attacks, bolster compliance with industry standards, and ultimately reduce costs associated with security incidents. 

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    EDF, Tomitribe, Crosskey, Blackboard, Travel audience
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Government8%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Spirent CyberFlood
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 31st in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, GitHub, Black Duck and Snyk, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our Sonatype Repository Firewall vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.