Anonymous UserSenior Cyber Security Architect and Engineer at a computer software company
Nagaraj SheshachalamLead Cyber Security Engineer at Ecolab Inc.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The pricing is reasonable if you're a large enterprise developing code. It's not super-expensive."
"Without getting too specific, I'd say the average yearly cost is around $50,000. The costs include licensing and maintenance support."
"The Veracode price model is based on application profiles, which is how you package your components for scanning."
"Compared to other similar products, the licensing and pricing are definitely competitive. If you see Checkmarx as the market leader, then we are talking about Veracode being a fraction of the cost. You also have to consider your hidden costs: you need a team to maintain it, a server, and resources. From that point of view, Veracode is great because the cost is really a fraction of many competitors."
Earn 20 points
At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.
Nexus Firewall is a perimeter quality control for software development. Similar to a network firewall, it leverages rules you define that automatically shield you from unacceptable software components entering and another set for stopping them from exiting your application development.
Veracode Software Composition detects open source vulnerabilities in the software development process with higher accuracy. Veracode SCA reduces false positives by prioritizing vulnerabilities in the execution path of the application. Its proprietary database contains significantly more vulnerabilities than the NVD because it datamines pull requests, bug reports, and release notes. It also looks for vulnerabilities in dependencies several layers deep. Veracode SCA is part of a comprehensive DevSecOps solution that covers multiple assessment types, enables developers, and helps organizations achieve AppSec governance.
Sonatype Nexus Firewall is ranked 8th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 1 review while Veracode Software Composition Analysis is ranked 7th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 8 reviews. Sonatype Nexus Firewall is rated 8.0, while Veracode Software Composition Analysis is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Firewall writes "Significantly decreases our time to market for secure apps by automating open source approval". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode Software Composition Analysis writes "Provides extensive guidance for writing secure code and pointing to vulnerable open source libraries". Sonatype Nexus Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Black Duck, Snyk, Checkmarx and HCL AppScan, whereas Veracode Software Composition Analysis is most compared with Black Duck, JFrog Xray, Snyk, WhiteSource and Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle.
See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.