Most Helpful Review
Use Accurics? Share your opinion.
Enables me to choose a vulnerable library and see versions that don't have any listed vulnerabilities
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Its pricing is competitive within the market. It's not very cheap, it's not very expensive."
"We're pretty happy with the price, for what it is delivering for us and the value we're getting from it."
"Pricing is comparable with some of the other products. We are happy with the pricing."
"The price is good. We certainly get a lot more in return. However, it's also hard to get the funds to roll out such a product for the entire firm. Therefore, pricing has been a limiting factor for us. However, it's a fair price."
"The license fee may be a bit harder for startups to justify. But it will save you a headache later as well as peace of mind. Additionally, it shows your own customers that you value security stuff and will protect yourselves from any licensing issues, which is good marketing too."
"In addition to the license fee for IQ Server, you have to factor in some running costs. We use AWS, so we spun up an additional VM to run this. If the database is RDS that adds a little bit extra too. Of course someone could run it on a pre-existing VM or physical server to reduce costs. I should add that compared to the license fee, the running costs are so minimal they had no effect on our decision to use IQ Server."
"Pricing is decent. It's not horrible. It's middle-of-the-road, as far as our ranking goes. They're a little bit more but that's also because they provide more."
"Lifecycle, to the best of my recollection, had the best pricing compared with other solutions."
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."
"They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey."
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization."
"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."
"Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."
"If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."
"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."
"We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."
Questions from the Community
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The report part is quite easy to read. The report part is very important to us because that is how we communicate to our… more »
Top Answer: I'm not involved in the financial aspects, but I don't think it's overly expensive. We use the professional version… more »
Top Answer: One thing that I would like to give feedback on is to scan the binary code. It's very difficult to find. It's under… more »
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.
Nexus Lifecycle gives you full control over your software supply chain and allows you to define rules, actions, and policies that work best for your organization and teams.
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.
Learn more about Accurics
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
Learn more about Veracode
|Automation Anywhere, NBA, GroundTruth, ServiceMax, Navis, Edcast||Genome.One, Blackboard, Crediterform, Crosskey, Intuit, Progress Software, Qualys, Liberty Mutual Insurance||State of Missouri, Rekner|
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm39%
Computer Software Company11%
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm32%
Computer Software Company8%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is ranked 4th in Application Security with 21 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security with 21 reviews. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is rated 8.6, while Veracode is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle writes "Checks our libraries for security and licensing issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Prevents vulnerable code from going into production, but the user interface is dated and needs considerable work". Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, WhiteSource, JFrog Xray and Snyk, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Coverity and Kiuwan. See our Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Application Security vendors.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.