We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Wiz based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector features an informative user interface and support for ISO certification checks. Wiz users like the user-friendly dashboards and risk prioritization. Users say SUSE NeuVector could be improved by expanding its scanning capabilities to include IaaS and virtual machines and easier integration. On the other hand, Wiz should focus on improving log integrations and reporting capabilities. Reviewers also want more visibility into EKS and Kubernetes containers.
Service and Support: SUSE NeuVector users value assistance from their support team, who are described as helpful and knowledgeable. However, some users said the overall process is complicated. Wiz customers commend the excellent support and accessible representatives. They also appreciate the strong post-sales support offered by Wiz.
Ease of Deployment: Users have reported mixed experiences with the initial setup of SUSE NeuVector, with some finding it to be complex and challenging. The initial setup of Wiz is considered to be straightforward and quick.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector charges annual licensing fees, and it's considered cheaper than other solutions. Wiz provides a straightforward pricing structure. However, some were concerned about possible price fluctuations, and other users find Wiz to be pricier than alternatives.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is beneficial for high-risk industries like financial services, while Wiz offers immediate advantages like improved asset management and vulnerability identification. Additionally, Wiz provides continuous value with new features and centralized investigations.
Comparison Results: SUSE NeuVector is preferred over Wiz because of its extensive features, informative user interface, and support for multiple clusters. It excels in performance, deployment, and cost.
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 20th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Wiz is ranked 2nd in Container Security with 11 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Wiz is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wiz writes "Multiple features help us prioritize remediation, and agentless implementation reduces overhead". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Wiz is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS Security Hub and Lacework. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Wiz report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
