Compare SWIFT InterAct vs. SWIFTnet FIN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SWIFT InterAct Logo
681 views|617 comparisons
SWIFTnet FIN Logo
651 views|571 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules.
Top Answer: I would like for them to work in real-time.
Top Answer: Our company sells this product to our clients and also integrates them into a client's environment. In most cases, it's the integration of systems, of interfaces with IBM MQ or Insights.
Ranking
Views
681
Comparisons
617
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
651
Comparisons
571
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
304
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
InterAct
Learn More
Overview

Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Offer
Learn more about SWIFT InterAct
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Sample Customers
Seceti
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm45%
Comms Service Provider18%
Computer Software Company13%
Media Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm48%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company13%
Media Company13%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SWIFT InterAct is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 7th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. SWIFT InterAct is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". SWIFT InterAct is most compared with Mule ESB, whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with .

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.