Compare SWIFT InterAct vs. SWIFTnet FIN

SWIFT InterAct is ranked 14th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 15th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFT InterAct is rated 0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 0. On the other hand, SWIFT InterAct is most compared with SWIFTnet FIN and Mule ESB, whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SWIFT InterAct Logo
588 views|520 comparisons
SWIFTnet FIN Logo
569 views|477 comparisons
Ranking
Views
588
Comparisons
520
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
569
Comparisons
477
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 91% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
InterAct
Learn
SWIFT
Video Not Available
SWIFT
Video Not Available
Overview
Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Offer
Learn more about SWIFT InterAct
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Sample Customers
SecetiAlcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email