If we need to scale Pulse Connect Secure we only need to add a license.

We are using the solution on a daily basis. We have approximately 500 users with 200 licenses.

Pulse Connect Secure is suitable for all types of organizations.

The solution is scalable. 

Scalability is good. Adding more gateways allows scaling up.

We have around 1,500 end users. 

Adding virtual instances allows scaling user access quickly with additional licenses. 

However, stability concerns outweigh the scalability benefits due to recurring security risks.

The scalability of Pulse Connect Secure was not good, but recently through updates, it is scalable.

We have over 1,000 users using this solution in my organization.

It is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so. 

10,000 employees are using this Pulse Secure, however, our licenses support about 30,000 concurrent connections.

There are around 4,000 to 5,000 users of the solution in my company.

The solution is scalable. We have 50,000 employees in our company and hundreds are using the solution each day. 

Pulse Connect Secure could be more scalable. The on-prem solution is not very scalable. It has got some limitations because they have only a few models.

There's room for improvement in the scalability of Pulse Connect Secure. It's a six out of ten for me. You can scale the solution, but not always up to the level you want or need.

When it is on-prem, it is not so scalable. To scale the solution, you also need to deploy new machines and configure them from scratch. It is not as easy as a cloud solution where you scale automatically according to your needs. The problem for us is that it is on-prem.

Pulse, like every box, has their dependency. If you are using a 5,000 or a 3,000, you can only connect X number of users according to the size of the box. Therefore, if you buy a bigger size, you can scale easily. You do, however, need to plan accordingly.

In terms of the ability to scale, I would rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We have a few thousand users in our organization. It is used daily.

The solution is scalable. You need to add a few more licenses, and it works fine. Currently, seven thousand or eight thousand people have current concurrent licenses.

The scalability is great. You can have whatever number of appliances you need.

We are an ISP, meaning we have different customers, and different organizations, for this VPN service. We have a very diverse set of clients. We have somewhere around 10,000 end-users for this platform.

Pulse Connect Secure is pretty much scalable, and I didn't have any problem in this aspect.

I have found Pulse Connect Secure to be scalable.

We have four people in my organization using this solution. We do not have plans to increase usage at this time.

My company has ten users for the product. 

As I only use Pulse Connect Secure on my laptop, I'm unsure of how scalable it is, but if all employees within my organization use it, then it should be scalable.

Scalability does not seem to be a problem. We currently have 50 licenses and close to 25 regular users. We expect this to increase because we have 80 or 90 people in total, who may be working from home.

For scalability, I would give it a 10 out of10. The solution is not just scalable, it's available, too. You can actually put two devices in a cluster so if one machine goes down service is not interrupted. You can add other configurations as well.

No.

No issues encountered.