Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar Reviews

OmniAccess Stellar AP1230 Series is better than CISCO highest model Aironet 3800i AP in terms of quality, user capacity, coverage, performance and price. Moreover, there's no Hardware Controller, it's totally managed by a software defined on-premises Controller which is easy very to handle.

Owner is highly satisfied based on OmniAccess WLAN and they are getting more performance than expected.

OmniVista 2500 managed Software defined Controller with OmniAccess Stellar AP1230 Series AP cost is very cheap compared to Cisco HW Controller or Cloud Controller or Virtual controller with Aironet 3800i AP. Besides, OmniVista 2500 manageability and AP performance is wonderful.

Six months.

No. Very simple configuration that anyone can configure who doesn't have wireless experience.

No. stable firmware.

OmniAccess WLAN's main advantage is its scalability which is better than CISCO.

Wonderful response and 24/7 service makes you happy.

10 out of 10.

We used CISCO AP but client was not happy with the number of client connections per AP. OmniAccess WLAN Stellar AP1230 Support for up to 768 associated clients per AP. Up to 512 APs when managed by OmniVista 2500 managed but no limit on the number of AP groups.

Simple, straightforward and easy to understand.

An in-house, as this configuration is very simple.

200% profit within three years full warranty.

Earlier I wouldn't give a reference to another vendor except CISCO. Now I would prefer OmniAccess WLAN Stellar AP1230.

SEE AP1230: http://enterprise.alcatel-luce...

SEE Aironet 3800i AP: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/ass...

Compare: a) performance b) capacity c) coverage d) controller cost e) number of users/clients per AP f) location tracking g) QoS h) security I) quality j) VoLAN.

Thanks.

We are installing this solution for our enterprise customers for access, applications, mail, and CRM. The product can also be used to provide access for remote workers.

The solution's most valuable aspects include its BYOD features, user network profiles, and unified communication.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. 

The solution needs to improve access for Mac and iOS devices.

There are occasional OS bugs.

I've been using the solution over the last three or so years. I've used it for a while now.

The product is 80% is stable. The only real issue is when there is an OS bug. Only then will there be an issue. The OEM is doing the OS bugs fixing.

The solution is scalable. It works for any size of company, no matter if it's a small business, enterprise, government, education, hospitality, or any other type of customer.

It's also easy to scale, as it's a soft controller. You just have to add on the licenses. It can scale up to 4,000 access points.

Our company tends to provide technical support to our clients if they need our help.

That said, if there is an OS bug or there is a vulnerability, then OEM needs to be aware the bug needs to be fixed. With regard to that, we contact technical support.

We also use Aruba. We use both simultaneously.

The solution offers a pretty simple setup. It's not overly complex or difficult. A company shouldn't have any issues with the process. However, it does depend on the organizational requirements.

The time it takes to deploy the solution also varies. A smaller setup, for example, may only take about two days. However, a larger setup could take longer.

We are a premium partner of Alcatel-Lucent.

Overall, I would recommend this solution to other users and companies.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We use this solution in hotels, hospitals, SMB enterprises, large enterprises, gyms, and also in our company. Every scenario is different and requires a different type of WLAN configuration.

Our company is a premium reseller in Portugal of Alcatel-Lucent (in all areas). With the improvement in the range of all Alcatel-Lucent products, our business has grown and we have the ability to acquire small enterprise projects where they have lower IT budgets.

This product can be divided in 3 types of WLAN. 

• OmniAccess WLAN (requires a physical controller)
• IAP WLAN (same as OAW but with a virtual controller, and the VC is exactly the same as OAW – limited by the number of APs)
• AP1101 (with a virtual controller, very simple and easy to use – intended for SMB, also limited to the number of APs).

With these three types, Alcatel-Lucent can give the client a range of solutions within budget of each, and still guarantee the quality of the solution.

The only area this product can grow is the web interface. It could be nicer and easier to use.

I haven’t had any problems with stability with OmniAccess WLAN, only in the new AP1101 with 5Ghz equipment. Alcatel released new firmware correcting this issue.

When you choose the best WLAN option you won’t have problems.

Alcatel has two kinds of support. The first will be from the official partner in your country. The second will be the international service. In the latter case, if a joint intervention is required, it can take some time and be out of operation for hours because this support is in Asia.

Before Alcatel had the new, cheaper solutions, we used D-Link, Tp-Link. Today there is no need for those solutions.

Today the setup is very easy, you can use a web browser and just follow the steps. I remember that in 2009, it was a little complex, but not too hard. You had to start the AP by CLI and choose the language for use (only English, German, and French were available) and select the country where you were using the system. Then all configurations were done by CLI.

The price is in the range of other brands like Cisco, maybe a little cheaper but you get the same features, facilities, and security. 

Licensing is something Alcatel is making changes to. A few years ago you would buy a WLAN solution from Alcatel for half the price of Cisco, but you would spend the same amount on licensing. Today this is different and the licensing is cheaper.

I’d rate this product as an eight out of 10 because it is not accessible to everyone to take 100% advantage of the product. Only those with certification and high-tech experience can get 100% out of it, not the average IT person.

Look at the needs of the client, or your own needs as an IT administrator, and look for an Alcatel reseller or partner with experience to help you with the solution.

I like the Captive Portal and the Spectrum Monitor features. The CLI is also very good.

With the Captive portal to manage the Guest access is very easy, and with the Spectrum Analysis some very difficult radio issues can be solved with very little effort from my side. The CLI is good, it is similar to other vendor's CLI but with enhanced features. 

The GUI is a little bit slow. 

Two years

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

Straightforward but very simple possibilities.

• Scalability,
• Centralization
• Redundancy.

These features allows us to control and deploy configuration for all remote OAW allowing centralized management.

We needed a solution to provide internet access for the majority of 317,68 KM square site and assure authentication, authorization and accountability compliance of users. OmniAccess has enabled us to do so.

Simplification of the configuration processes and improvement of the maintenance software OmniVista 3600.

4 years.

Yes, I had bugs when deploying with different Internet Browsers.

No issues encountered.

No. We currently have >100 users and increasing.

5/10

7/10

Yes, I used solutions based on different Access Points, with independent management. I switched to OmniAccess because it is centralized, and has great scalability.

We used the wizard for initial configuration and it was straightforward.

I implemented it myself after doing training with Alcatel.

Our RO`i isn't money related, since it is used to a community service.

We don't have any costs related to this product.

Yes, one solution based on Cisco.

Good planning, before implementing this solution.