In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.

I previously used Jira Portfolio. It was a more mature product.

Presently, I use IBM DOORS.

We also use Atlasia.

I have taken courses on Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, but have not used it for more than two years. I find that codeBeamer ALM is easier to use.

I have also used Jira and I find it to be a very simple tool. If you want functionality then you have to buy other gadgets to do it. Another drawback with Jira is that you have to write SQL queries, which people don't have time for.

We did not use another solution prior to this one.