Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,948 views|3,057 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
25,110 views|19,203 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Microsoft Azure DevOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance.""The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.""The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability.""There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful."

More Codebeamer Pros →

"We use all the DevOps features and services, like reports, Boards, Pipelines, Artifactory, etc. The interface is interactive and intuitive. The platform visuals and workflow are straightforward in Azure DevOps.""The installation is very straightforward.""You get a complete solution with Azure DevOps. You can do everything in one place, starting from requirement gathering until you release the product. It is a reliable, scalable, and handy product.""Detailed logs allow us to pinpoint the exact cause of any issues, making troubleshooting efficient and accurate.""The product is easy to use and very stable.""The most valuable features of this solution are the CI/CD pipeline, and the testing automation.""Some of the valuable features are the functionality and the wide range of capabilities.""I like the cloud infrastructure of Microsoft Azure DevOps."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pros →

Cons
"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved.""Usability needs to be improved.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup.""It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now.""The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required.""During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.""Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs."

More Codebeamer Cons →

"When we don't have some permissions, we have to research how to get them.""Integration and plugins for other tools could better. Like if you want to integrate the DevOps with other tools that are in the market. This could be for the engineering tools to check code quality, application security tools, and DevOps dashboard tools.""With the query feature, we have to group items, so it becomes difficult for everyone to understand it. It's easier in JIRA, which has filters and other query options.""More features can be included.""One potential enhancement in Azure DevOps could be integrating more customizable reporting features, particularly for Power BI integration.""The tutorials for building pipelines are an area that is a bit technical for a beginner.""Project management could be improved.""I would like to automate notifications on sprint planning. When we are getting to the end of sprint planning, we would be automatically notified."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a good tool, quite rich, it has a lot of features, and quite a lot of analytical capabilities which are built on top of it so that you can see how your projects are going and all that stuff. It's a good tool."
  • "There is a licensing fee of $6/user per month."
  • "The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools."
  • "It is the least expensive product in this class."
  • "I find that the pricing is good, and it is competitive with the other vendors in the market."
  • "Microsoft Azure DevOps is free for up to five users and allows you to track a maximum of three projects."
  • "It is a subscription model and I only pay for what I use."
  • "The price of this solution is fair."
  • More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.
    Top Answer:Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalable… more »
    Top Answer:TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is task management.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    25,110
    Comparisons
    19,203
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    650
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions. 

    Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:

    • Azure Pipelines - Develop and deploy services to support ongoing application integration and delivery. Azure pipelines, which work with almost every project type and most languages, will automatically test code projects in order to make them available to others.

    • Azure Artifacts - Share packages and integrate package sharing between teams. Packages include NuGet, npm, and Maven, in addition to other private and public sources. Developers can now share and consume packages with other developers from different public registries.

    • Azure Repos - Offers source control of your code through Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) or Git repositories. Developers can now keep track of any changes that are made in their code over the course of their project.

    • Azure Test Plans - Offers continuous and manual/exploratory app testing through several tools. Test Suites, or a collection of Test Cases, are grouped together in a container called a Test Plan.

    • Azure Boards - Provides a suite of Agile tools to track work, support planning, code defects, and general issues while using Kanban and Scrum software. Teams are in need of tools that are flexible and will help them grow. Azure Boards is a service that helps developers manage their software projects. 

    Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps

    Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:

    • A quick setup and easy deployment
    • An elastic scale
    • Exceptional security
    • No-maintenance operations
    • Effortless collaboration through domains
    • The ability to create and deploy products faster than traditional software

    Reviews from Real Users

    Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.

    PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.” 

    Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”

    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Codebeamer vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 124 reviews. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Good support, helpful management capabilities, and great Kanban boards". Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Polarion ALM, Jira, IBM Rational ALM and Jama Connect, whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with GitLab, Jira, TFS, Rally Software and OpenText ALM Octane. See our Codebeamer vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.