Compare 3scale API Management vs. CA API Management

3scale API Management is ranked 12th in API Management with 2 reviews while CA API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 23 reviews. 3scale API Management is rated 8.0, while CA API Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 3scale API Management writes "Easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA API Management writes "APIs can be developed to provide security and we can show everything in a single pane of glass". 3scale API Management is most compared with Apigee, IBM API Connect and WSO2 API Manager, whereas CA API Management is most compared with Apigee, IBM API Connect and Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager. See our 3scale API Management vs. CA API Management report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about 3scale API Management vs. CA API Management and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's good that they aren't adding a lot of features like ESP, etc. It's okay with just being a gateway.

Read more »

This improved our organization, because it gives the management data to discuss for the next course of action and it suggests what to work on, as the next thing.I work for an information security company. CA API Management is capable of using tokens for authorization to manage access control for the APIs.As an organization grow, you can use CA API Management for authentication purposes through the CA API Gateway. It allows for multiple identity providers with different Active Directories.The solution helped us to quickly publish and monetize APIs. I have used versioning responses to publish or send APIs to different customers with different versions.From a security standpoint, it works great. It is the right solution for us. It's lightweight, a software-appliance configuration which was easy to deploy and configure.There are a few assertions which are built-in for threat protection. I have used them for vulnerabilities, like for DDoS attacks, XML schema validation, IP restriction, and for cross-domain.Containerization and the monetization module are quite unique for an API tool... In addition, the development time and rollout time are pretty quick.The security checking authentication is our primary use case for this solution.

Read more »

Cons
I believe the CMS part of it has room for improvement though. That is where you write a couple of things if you want to publish your API. It's based on liquid scripting, which doesn't seem like the obvious ones to script with.

Read more »

From the last version, they have added more dashboard support, but there is still a lot they need to improve. In terms of monitoring, it's almost all covered. The interface can be improved, though.One specific feature that we need is the ability to authenticate directly to the server with API data. It's not complex nowadays. This is a feature that we need and CA doesn't have it.They need a workflow for the API Developer Portal, where the process only allows requests to go to the correct person.The implementation of CA API Management was complex. It is a complicated solution. You have to know so much IT knowledge to do the implementation.The entire lifecycle management approach needs improvement: from the API management, development, deployment, some of the settings around the quotas, and some security policy applications, etc. for the APIs. We found the Apigee platform a lot more robust in that area.There are old algorithms that the tool does not support - and it shouldn't, in my opinion. But sometimes customers need old algorithms, from old use cases and old applications, migrated to the platform. At those times, there are hiccups that happen.The security protocols in CA's product, for financial services, weren't as good as those in API Connect.We have experienced technical difficulties with the product in the past.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
APIs can be developed to provide security. We can show them in one single pane of glass, such as the CA API Management API Developer Portal. It is there that we can provide the monetization for their APIs and what is happening on third-party applications, like Paytm or BookMyShow.CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time.It has a reasonable pricing model by instance.For what we are after, the pricing is okay. It is competitive.We weren't comfortable with the pricing of licensing. It was slightly more expensive than its competitors.I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product.I think it's competitive. It's not that expensive when you compare CA with the Oracle product.I feel that it is costly for medium-sized companies.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 30 in API Management
Views
3,399
Comparisons
2,625
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
488
Avg. Rating
8.0
1st
out of 30 in API Management
Views
17,007
Comparisons
7,284
Reviews
28
Average Words per Review
621
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
Learn
Red Hat
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Overview

3scale is an API management platform that delivers flexible, highly scalable solutions to package, distribute, control, and monetize your APIs, giving you the power to make the most of your API program.

  • Share company data, content, or services through Web or mobile applications.
  • Provide an API to external organizations, internal teams, or both.
  • Avoid the hassle and constant maintenance of building a solution from scratch.

3scale delivers centralized API management features through a distributed, cloud-hosted layer. The platform includes built-in features to help you build a more successful API program, including access control, rate limits, payment gateway integration, and developer experience tools.

To compete successfully and thrive today, enterprises across every industry need to transform. This process is not just about incremental improvement, but about evolving core businesses to meet the demands of today’s connected world.

CA API Management accelerates this digital transformation by providing the capabilities you need to bring systems together, secure these integrations, deliver better customer experiences faster and capitalize on new opportunities.

Read more at http://www.ca.com/api

Offer
Learn more about 3scale API Management
Learn more about CA API Management
Sample Customers
Victor Ops, Coca Cola, The Telegraph, Skava, Orange, TypeformAlaska Airlines, The Advisory Board Company, Amerigroup, IceMobile, R+V Versicherung, U.S. Army - plus hundreds of other customers in the banking, energy, finance, healthcare, government, manufacturing, transportation and retail sectors.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider17%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
Manufacturing Company8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Logistics Company9%
Insurance Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer23%
Software R&D Company19%
Financial Services Firm15%
Media Company12%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise94%
Find out what your peers are saying about 3scale API Management vs. CA API Management and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.