3SL Cradle vs Accept360 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo
453 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Accept Logo
40 views|26 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and Accept360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Siegmar-Schuenke
Use Accept360?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
Top Answer:3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be 100% accessible in a web browser.
Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
453
Comparisons
308
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
40
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cradle
Learn More
Overview

Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

Bringing the right products to market is hard enough. It doesn’t help when spreadsheets and slide decks remain your primary means for product planning. Things can get ugly in a hurry when you have to manage multiple products, globally dispersed teams, and thousands of intricate requirements, priorities, and dependencies.

Sample Customers
NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
Cadence, Ultimate Software, NVIDIA, McAfee, Visma, Epicor, Avira, Basware, Tekla
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while Accept360 is ranked 16th in Application Requirements Management. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while Accept360 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas Accept360 is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.