3SL Cradle vs Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo
453 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Siegmar-Schuenke
Use Micro Focus Caliber [EOL]?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
Top Answer:3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities. In the next release, I would like 3SL Cradle to be 100% accessible in a web browser.
Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
453
Comparisons
308
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Requirements Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cradle
Borland Caliber
Learn More
Overview

Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

Caliber (formerly Borland Caliber) is a complete requirements solution which ensures compliance and alignment of development to your business needs. Caliber facilitates stakeholder collaboration, rich visualization, robust management, and traceability of requirements to agile delivery plans. Deliver software with greater precision, less re-work, shorter release cycles, compliance with internal and external regulations, and improved customer satisfaction.
Sample Customers
NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
QinetiQ, Invertix Corporation, K.J. Ross & Associates, Siem Consub, Ministry of Defence _ France
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Computer Software Company14%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Requirements Management. 3SL Cradle is rated 9.0, while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and Jira, whereas Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.