Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] vs Kiteworks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Acronis Logo
views| comparisons
Kiteworks Logo
1,725 views|1,222 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] and Kiteworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."
  • "I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."
  • "They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."
  • "The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."
  • "The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."
  • "The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."
  • More Kiteworks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual private… more »
    Top Answer:The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of support. My team always faces challenges in accessing fast resolution for the issues.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    1,725
    Comparisons
    1,222
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    871
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Acronis File Sync and Share
    Accellion
    Learn More
    Overview

    Designed exclusively for Service Providers, Acronis Files Cloud delivers safe mobile file access, sync, and share in a simple, complete, and secure hosted cloud solution.

    Acronis Files Cloud - An easy-to-use file, sync, and share (FSS) solution designed with your customer’s security and privacy in mind. A safe choice given Acronis’ proven AnyData Engine and years of data protection expertise. Launch quickly with zero entry costs and a per-use business model Provides multi-tier, multitenant flexible services. Acronis Files Cloud provides APIs to connect to your existing business systems.

    Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

    Sample Customers
    University of East Anglia, Rust-Oleum, Government of Basel-Stadt, Forward, University of Central Lancashire Learning and Information Services, Malmberg Uitgevery, Bokf_rlaget Natur & Kultur, QuadGraphics, United States Department of Agriculture, Parrish Construction Group
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Kiteworks is ranked 6th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 12 reviews. Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Kiteworks is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kiteworks writes "A unified, secure way to share sensitive content, with no file size limitations". Acronis Files Cloud [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Kiteworks is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, MOVEit, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, SharePoint and Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.