We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."It is very easy to scale the product."
"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."
"The technical support is top-notch."
"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."
"It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"It's agentless, and it's scalable."
"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."
"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
"It could be a little cheaper."
"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."
"The price could be better."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
"It would be good to integrate Portnox CORE with CLEAR."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls."
Earn 20 points
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while Portnox CORE is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox Clear.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
