Most Helpful Review
Good stability and enables us to identify and isolate a machine that is infected or that is going to be infected
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs. Portnox CORE and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Using this solution gives us the ability to allow proper access to the network.
The biggest value of ISE is that it can get so granular with gaming systems, versus IoT and BYOD.
Easy to use and provides good support
The best feature of the Cisco ISE platform is that it is compatible with Microsoft products.
We found that the most valuable features associated with this tool are posture assessment, policy management, VLAN assignments, guest assignment, and BYOD services. In addition to these services, the Cisco IOS software switch configuration feature is another very valuable aspect of the policy and compliance solution.
In terms of scalability, you need to factor in your licenses. With a virtual platform, the scalability is more than sufficient. We have over one thousand users.
Visitors can be granted access to the wifi network using their cellphones, notebooks or tablets in a very easy way. The ease of accessibility that anyone can have to the network is very quick and is a big improvement in our network.
For guests we give them limited access to the internet when they come in so that access has been useful. Previously, we just used to give them the APN key which they would leave with. Now, we give them credentials to use that are for a limited period of time.
The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away.
This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources.
Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically.
It's agentless, and it's scalable.
There should be a single button that can be pressed to dismiss all of the alarms at once.
I'd like to see an easier way to upgrade to larger versions, as well as more best practices that are easier to locate on their support page.
An area that could be improved is the agent. The challenge now is that agent and most of the computers have changed. They could think about agent-less deployment.
Cisco ISE is complex. The deployment and design of networks with it is so complex. If it could change it would be better.
There are issues with respect to the posture assessment function. It's been observed that customers are not receiving total access to the network because the assessment agent is glitchy and malfunctions from time-to-time. I would like to see refining of the compliance assessment and adding more detailed compliance of endpoints on the user end.
There can be a little bit more integration between the controller management and ISE. There are two dashboards, you have the controller dashboards, and you have the ISE dashboard it would is a way to maybe integrate that into one. That would be great. It's not that bad. It would be easier if it could be combined into one dashboard.
There should be an easier way to do the upgrades. There are a lot of steps to get to the next version from the previous version which ends up being a bit of the headache with the upgrade.
In order to make it a ten, it should be more user-friendly. You need somebody who is knowledgeable about it to use it. It's not easy to use. We have to rely heavily on technical support.
The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved.
It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls.
Pricing and Cost Advice
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap.
Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support.
out of 22 in Network Access Control
Average Words per Review
out of 22 in Network Access Control
Average Words per Review
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco ISE||Access Layers portnox|
|Identity Services Engine is a security policy management platform that automates and enforces context-aware security access to network resources. It delivers superior user and device visibility to support enterprise mobility experiences and to control access. It shares data with integrated partner solutions to accelerate their capabilities to identify, mitigate, and remediate threats.|
Portnox CORE provides 100% actionable visibility and control of all devices that are connected to the enterprise network. As a software-based Network Access Management (NAM) platform, Portnox CORE’s patented solution allows for efficient management of the security and compliance challenges that organizations face in a smart and simple way.
Learn more about Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine)
Learn more about Portnox CORE
|Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University||EL AL Israeli Airlines, Channel 10 News, Wales Millennium Centre, The College of Management Academic Studies|
Comms Service Provider31%
Software R&D Company25%
Comms Service Provider20%
No Data Available