We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and Casepoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."
"Casepoint is scalable. I don't have any issues with the scalability of this solution."
"The initial setup was quite straightforward. It's really just a matter of plug-and-play."
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."
"I hate everything about it this product. It is not user-friendly."
"The biggest pain point for me and most people is that when we have to update our passwords, we have to go back in and remap our web folders."
AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Casepoint is ranked 12th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Casepoint is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Casepoint writes " A reliable solution that could benefit from some adjustment, stability-wise". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Casepoint is most compared with kCura Relativity and Logikcull.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
