• Home
  • AccessData FTK [EOL] vs. Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL]

AccessData FTK [EOL] vs Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features
Use Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AccessData FTK is too expensive compared to EnCase."

    • More AccessData FTK [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    Unranked
    In eDiscovery
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AccessData Forensic Toolkit
    Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery
    Learn More
    Exterro
    Dell Technologies
    Overview

    FTK is built for speed, stability and ease of use. It provides comprehensive processing and indexing up front, so filtering and searching is faster than with any other product. This means you can zero in on the relevant evidence quickly, dramatically increasing your analysis speed.

    EMC Kazeon eDiscovery is a quick-to-deploy appliance-based product that automates the in-house identification, collection, preservation, processing, analysis, and review of content that resides in live and archive data sources such as desktops, laptops, Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Network File System (NFS) file shares, Microsoft Exchange, Symantec Enterprise Vault, Microsoft SharePoint, and IBM Lotus Domino, and in corporate archives and content management repositories, such as EMC Documentum. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery in-place capabilities allows organizations to conduct eDiscovery and investigations, rapidly ascertain risk exposure, and meet privacy requirements while only collecting ESI which is relevant and legally obtainable. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery further provides flexibility, speed, and accuracy in transparently collecting relevant ESI in a defensible manner complete with auditing and data verification capabilities. With a simple user interface, legal teams can perform collection in a single step without requiring IT resources.
    Sample Customers
    Royal Military Police
    Wentworth Douglass Hospital
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with OpenText EnCase eDiscovery.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.