Compare AccessData Group Summation vs. IBM eDiscovery Manager
Ranking  | |
Views 327 Comparisons 285 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 78 Comparisons 51 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 52% of the time.  Compared 48% of the time. |  Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Summation | eDiscovery Manager |
Learn | |
| AccessData Group | IBM |
Overview | |
| Litigation software that stores accurate data to be presented in trials, and save money by automating data storage | IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks. |
Offer | |
Learn more about AccessData Group Summation | Learn more about IBM eDiscovery Manager |
Sample Customers | |
| Archer & Greiner, Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Solomon Ward, AD Triage, Dorsey & Whitney, Shipman & Goodwin, | Hansgrohe |
AccessData Group Summation is ranked 13th in eDiscovery while IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 23rd in eDiscovery. AccessData Group Summation is rated 0.0, while IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AccessData Group Summation is most compared with kCura Relativity and LexisNexis Concordance Classic, whereas IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.