• Home
  • AccessData Group Summation [EOL] vs. LAW PreDiscovery

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] vs LAW PreDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData Group Summation [EOL] and LAW PreDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AccessData Group Summation [EOL]?
Jovana Pavlovic
Reliable, with a detailed and comprehensive checklist suitable for small businesses
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LAW PreDiscovery?
Top Answer:The sourcing and the detailed background checklist are the most valuable features of this solution.
What needs improvement with LAW PreDiscovery?
Top Answer:They have a lot of these 100% matches with no details or sources for certain names that are very common in certain countries. It is difficult for us to determine whether or not it is that person… more »
What is your primary use case for LAW PreDiscovery?
Top Answer:We use LAW PreDiscovery to perform required checks every time we receive KYC from our clients to see if they have any political affiliation or if they have any criminal background that we need to know… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
8th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
310
Comparisons
192
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,062
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Summation
Learn More
Exterro
LexisNexis
Overview
Litigation software that stores accurate data to be presented in trials, and save money by automating data storage

LAW PreDiscovery software works as an all-in-one "eDiscovery engine" to scan, import, and produce all of the potential evidentiary documents needed during legal discovery. LexisNexis LAW PreDiscovery leads the way in document production, including the most flexible imaging and endorsing capabilities. Hundreds of file types exports directly to Concordance software and other leading document review platforms in a wide range of formats and Identifies and extracts content from file types, scan documents from scanners, and produce printed or digital output. LAW PreDiscovery handles even the largest imaging, endorsing, OCR, or print jobs by just adding additional workstations.

Sample Customers
Archer & Greiner, Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Solomon Ward, AD Triage, Dorsey & Whitney, Shipman & Goodwin,
Murphy & King, BDO Consulting, Beasley Allen
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Legal Firm33%
Government23%
Computer Software Company16%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise59%
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while LAW PreDiscovery is ranked 8th in eDiscovery with 1 review. AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while LAW PreDiscovery is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of LAW PreDiscovery writes "Reliable, with a detailed and comprehensive checklist suitable for small businesses". AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LAW PreDiscovery is most compared with IPRO and Nuix eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.