We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Accordo Cloud Optimizer vs. Azure Cost Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
8,196 views|4,215 comparisons
Accordo Cloud Optimizer Logo
13 views|5 comparisons
Azure Cost Management Logo
2,328 views|1,999 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic, an IBM company, VMware, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"I think the solution was free initially.""Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better."

More Azure Cost Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Pricing is pretty straightforward. We haven't seen any major increases in it. It's a flexible model. There aren't… more »
Top Answer: The GUI and policy creation have room for improvement. There should be a better view of some of the numbers that are… more »
Top Answer: We do vMotion through VMware. We let Turbonomic control our vMotion. We do server rightsizing and capacity management… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We don't actually use the Azure Cost Management features. We have our own capabilities. We put our own technology on top… more »
Top Answer: Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better.
Top Answer: The policy-based remediation is probably the biggest area where Azure is lacking and that's why we sell a lot of our… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn
Learn More
Overview

Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

Accordo Cloud Optimizer for Office 365 saves you time and resources by optimizing client Office 365 license spend and identifying new opportunities to build additional cloud revenue.

Other tools give you lots of data to sift through on your own. Accordo Cloud Optimizer make sense of this data by aggregating, analyzing and exposing key opportunities such as reallocating Office 365 spend across other cloud services.

Azure Cost Management empowers organizations to monitor cloud spend, drive organizational accountabilities, and optimize cloud efficiency so they can accelerate future cloud investments with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about Accordo Cloud Optimizer
Learn more about Azure Cost Management
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
Wulf Consulting
Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise51%
Large Enterprise34%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Large Enterprise92%
Find out what your peers are saying about Turbonomic, an IBM company, VMware, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Accordo Cloud Optimizer is ranked 23rd in Cloud Cost Management while Azure Cost Management is ranked 3rd in Cloud Cost Management with 8 reviews. Accordo Cloud Optimizer is rated 0.0, while Azure Cost Management is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "Good reporting and ideal for small to medium-sized companies but needs better policy-based remediation". Accordo Cloud Optimizer is most compared with , whereas Azure Cost Management is most compared with AWS Savings Plans, CloudHealth, CloudCheckr CMx High Security, Cloudability and Oracle Analytics Cloud.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.