We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
More ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 1 review while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is rated 8.0, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub writes "Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is most compared with , whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.