Actional vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
186 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Correlsense Logo
139 views|108 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and Correlsense SharePath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
186
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
139
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Correlsense SharePath is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.