Actional vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
183 views|145 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Nastel Technologies Logo
166 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Ranking
Views
183
Comparisons
145
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
166
Comparisons
117
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with . See our Actional vs. Nastel AutoPilot report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.