Actional vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
183
Comparisons
145
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
189
Comparisons
174
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Nudge APM
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

The APM solution fully integrated with Real End User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring.

Be able to monitor and diagnose quickly any application performance slowdown with a fully integrated APM and User Monitoring solution. Start from the End User eyes and application response time monitoring down to code analysis and diagnostic. It has never been so easy to discover the root cause of any slow response time.

With few clics you can drill down and fix a problem to avoid any end user dissatisfaction or complain. APM is now integrated with End User Monitoring for a full understanding of what is happening. You can now monitor End User Satisfaction in production.

Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
Bank and Insurance : Crédit Agricole, CDC (Caisse des dépots et consignations), ACMS (French healthcare insurance), Service : Unibail Rodamco, Elis, Public : CNIL, Mairie de Paris, AESN, HAS, EPIDE, Ministere Education Nationale Software : Jalma, Neoxia, AFI, Traceone, Infinancials, Telecom operator : NordNet Media : Les Echos,
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is ranked 70th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring writes "Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is most compared with . See our Actional vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.