Compare Actional vs. Sematext SPM Performance Monitoring

Actional is ranked 56th in Application Performance Management (APM) while Sematext SPM Performance Monitoring is ranked 42nd in Application Performance Management (APM). Actional is rated 0, while Sematext SPM Performance Monitoring is rated 0. On the other hand, Actional is most compared with Aurea CX Messenger, TIBCO Hawk and eG Enterprise, whereas Sematext SPM Performance Monitoring is most compared with Datadog, New Relic Browser and Splunk.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
299
Comparisons
206
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
586
Comparisons
492
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: February 2020.
399,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
SPM Performance Monitoring, SPM Performance Monitoring, Alerting and Anomaly Detection, Sematext Logsene
Learn
Aurea
Sematext
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.SPM Performance Monitoring is an enterprise-class, server and application performance monitoring, alerting, and anomaly detection solution. It is available both in the cloud (SaaS) and on premises. Integration with Logsene enables correlation of metrics, alerts, anomalies, and events with application and server logs.
Offer
Learn more about Actional
Learn more about Sematext SPM Performance Monitoring
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom MortgageEPAM Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: February 2020.
399,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.