We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and G-Core Labs CDN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product provides reduced latency and quicker site refreshes."
"It has built-in DDoS protection, which protects against DDoS attacks."
"Feature-wise, I like the solution's signed URL because it provides security for me."
"The product is very well interconnected with other Amazon services."
"The most valuable feature is the number of servers they can put your content in while being reliable."
"The speed and usability of the solution are valuable."
"It is an expensive product with valuable features."
"The distribution aspect of CloudFront and its ability to reduce latency are most beneficial."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"A lot of caching features must be added to the solution."
"The product could support any network load balancer. At present, we can use only Amazon’s load balancer application."
"Amazon CloudFront is harder to understand compared to Azure."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."
"Amazon CloudFront can improve by accurately determining the latency of a non-defined URL that the solution encounters."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The lack of seamless integration made the setup process more complex and required additional research to manage all the services properly."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 21 reviews while G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.0, while G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and KeyCDN, whereas G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Imperva DDoS. See our Amazon CloudFront vs. G-Core Labs CDN report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
