We performed a comparison between G-Core Labs CDN and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"The complete solution is valuable for everything it delivers and the protection it offers."
"It is a stable solution."
"Incapsula takes care of the CDN infrastructure and bandwidth volume, providing several enterprise "load balancing" features."
"This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go."
"I like the user-friendly interface."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"The rules surrounding the making of web applications could be improved."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"It would be better if we were able to manage and apply changes to multiple websites/web applications, and search WAF logs for multiple websites, via the Incapsula dashboard."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon CloudFront, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our G-Core Labs CDN vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.