We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is excellent."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications."
"We do not have to do a lot of administration, such as create virtual machines, or worry about our controllers or nodes going down because the solution is fully managed by Amazon."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"Amazon EKS can be used to implement and create clusters."
"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."
"We can do a lot of provisioning."
"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."
"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."
"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I would like Amazon EKS to be easier to configure on various environments like Windows or Linux installations"
"It is very cumbersome to assign permissions to users to interact with a cluster."
"I am not impressed with the tool's Amazon console. It also needs to add security features."
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."
"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."
"I have issues with the product's interoperability."
"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."
"We need a backup of production clusters."
"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."
"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."
"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 38 reviews while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is ranked 11th in Container Management with 9 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "An easily downloadable solution that enables containerization without relying on cloud infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE writes "Stable platform with an easy initial setup process ". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform, whereas Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and VMware Aria Operations for Applications. See our Amazon EKS vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
