We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"It's very quick and easy to build or set up Amazon SQS."
"One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"As a company that uses IBM solutions, it's difficult to compare Amazon SQS to other solutions. We have been using IBM solutions for a long time and they are very mature in integration and queuing. In my role as an integration manager, I can say that Amazon SQS is designed primarily for use within the Amazon ecosystem and does not have the same level of functionality as IBM MQ or other similar products. It has limited connectivity options and does not easily integrate with legacy systems."
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"JBoss could add more automation."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ, Anypoint MQ and IBM MQ, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
