Compare Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon SQS Logo
8,895 views|8,655 comparisons
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Logo
281 views|265 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."

More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.
Top Answer: Documentation of this solution can be improved. Sometimes, the images in the document are from older versions.
Top Answer: The primary use case of this solution is for collecting event data for analytic purposes. In our case, when a user selects a function in our app, the information is collected. Analytics is performed… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
8,895
Comparisons
8,655
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
247
Rating
8.0
Views
281
Comparisons
265
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon SQS
Learn more about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Sample Customers
EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Media Company13%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: July 2021.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Amazon SQS is ranked 6th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 13th in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Amazon SQS is rated 8.0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "An affordable, easy-to-scale solution that is simple to deploy and maintain". On the other hand, Amazon SQS is most compared with Amazon MQ, Apache Kafka, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, IBM MQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ and ActiveMQ.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.