Compare Anaqua IAM vs. Quantify IP Global IP Estimator

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
305
Comparisons
230
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
74
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
IAM
Learn More
Overview

ANAQUA Enterprise solution goes beyond traditional IP management to deliver 360° IAM with business, market and legal views of a company's IP assets integrated with automated workflows, internal and external data, workspaces and anywhere mobile access.

Quantify IP's Global IP Estimator program can take your firm's international Intellectual Property cost estimation to a whole new level, boosting the confidence of your current clients, while attracting new ones. 

Global IP Estimator combines expert technology with worldwide coverage of IP fees and timeline projections to bring you instant, accurate, and customizable results. One look and it's easy to see why it's the most widely used intellectual property future cost estimating software in the world.

Offer
Learn more about Anaqua IAM
Learn more about Quantify IP Global IP Estimator
Sample Customers
Novo Nordisk
Exxon Mobil Global Services, Chevron, Johnson & Johnson, Caterpillar, Goodyear Tire & Rubber, 3M, Bridgestone/Firestone Inc, Pfizer,GE Healthcare, Unilever

Anaqua IAM is ranked 2nd in Intellectual Property Management while Quantify IP Global IP Estimator is ranked 5th in Intellectual Property Management. Anaqua IAM is rated 0.0, while Quantify IP Global IP Estimator is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Anaqua IAM is most compared with CPA Global and TechInsights, whereas Quantify IP Global IP Estimator is most compared with CPA Global.

See our list of best Intellectual Property Management vendors.

We monitor all Intellectual Property Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.