We performed a comparison between AntWorks CMR+ and Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."Pattern recognition ultimately helps us to circumvent the problems in dealing with format variability in documents and allows us to capture the right data."
"The automation provided by this solution has saved us a lot of time."
"I would say that the cross-integration between different modules, such as between the OCR, RPA, and ML, is the most valuable feature."
"We would like to see the overall accuracy increase from approximately 70% to perhaps 85%."
"It would be very helpful to have a simple and extensive training guide, or training model, to help learn how to work with the product."
"Better training and better accessibility of the tools are the things that need to be improved."
Earn 20 points
AntWorks CMR+ is ranked 9th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 2 reviews while Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is ranked 42nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). AntWorks CMR+ is rated 8.0, while Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of AntWorks CMR+ writes "Leading-edge NLP capabilities, efficient training of machine learning models, and the automation saves us significant time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA writes "Stable with good cross-integration between modules, but the training needs to be improved". AntWorks CMR+ is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, UiPath and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Edgeverve AssistEdge Cloud RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
