We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"The tool is user-friendly."
"The product is stable."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"A complete project management suite in one integrated package."
"The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."
"The documentation must be improved."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."
"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our Apache Airflow vs. SoftExpert BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.