Apache Derby vs IBM solidDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
651 views|582 comparisons
IBM Logo
256 views|167 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Derby and IBM solidDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Your concern as a mainframe engineer is understandable, and the decision by Fujitsu to give up its mainframe business is significant, raising questions about the future of the mainframe market… more »
Ranking
Views
651
Comparisons
582
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
256
Comparisons
167
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn More
Overview

Apache Derby, an Apache DB subproject, is an open source relational database implemented entirely in Java and available under the Apache License, Version 2.0. Some key advantages include:

  • Derby has a small footprint -- about 2.6 megabytes for the base engine and embedded JDBC driver.
  • Derby is based on the Java, JDBC, and SQL standards.
  • Derby provides an embedded JDBC driver that lets you embed Derby in any Java-based solution.
  • Derby also supports the more familiar client/server mode with the Derby Network Client JDBC driver and Derby Network Server.
  • Derby is easy to install, deploy, and use.

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Sample Customers
Logitech, Splice Machine, CrowdStrike, Lever, Human Solutions
Iskratel
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Educational Organization11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization20%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company9%
Retailer7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Derby is ranked 26th in Relational Databases Tools while IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases Tools. Apache Derby is rated 0.0, while IBM solidDB is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". Apache Derby is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle Database, Oracle Database In-Memory and Oracle Java DB, whereas IBM solidDB is most compared with IBM Db2 Database and MySQL.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.