Apache Hadoop vs IBM Db2 Warehouse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,630 views|2,223 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
973 views|521 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Hadoop and IBM Db2 Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Hadoop vs. IBM Db2 Warehouse Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Donghan Kim
Josef Kraus
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What comes with the standard setup is what we mostly use, but Ambari is the most important.""Hadoop is designed to be scalable, so I don't think that it has limitations in regards to scalability.""​​Data ingestion: It has rapid speed, if Apache Accumulo is used.""It's open-source, so it's very cost-effective.""One valuable feature is that we can download data.""Since both Apache Hadoop and Amazon EC2 are elastic in nature, we can scale and expand on demand for a specific PoC, and scale down when it's done.""The tool's stability is good.""It's good for storing historical data and handling analytics on a huge amount of data."

More Apache Hadoop Pros →

"It can be mounted on the cloud, which is a huge plus. If the client, for example, starts small with on-premise deployment and then it rapidly needs to grow, we can transfer this to the cloud easily.""Some of the best features are stored procedures, parallelism, and different indexing strategies.""The standout feature of IBM Db2 Warehouse, which is particularly valuable for large enterprises, is its ability to handle big data.""I think it scales really well and as long as you take enough time to learn a little bit about it, it works really well.""Provides good security and reliability.""The analytics engine is not bad at forecasting predictions."

More IBM Db2 Warehouse Pros →

Cons
"The integration with Apache Hadoop with lots of different techniques within your business can be a challenge.""Real-time data processing is weak. This solution is very difficult to run and implement.""It requires a great deal of learning curve to understand. The overall Hadoop ecosystem has a large number of sub-products. There is ZooKeeper, and there are a whole lot of other things that are connected. In many cases, their functionalities are overlapping, and for a newcomer or our clients, it is very difficult to decide which of them to buy and which of them they don't really need. They require a consulting organization for it, which is good for organizations such as ours because that's what we do, but it is not easy for the end customers to gain so much knowledge and optimally use it.""In the next release, I would like to see Hive more responsive for smaller queries and to reduce the latency.""The load optimization capabilities of the product are an area of concern where improvements are required.""The solution is very expensive.""The price could be better. I think we would use it more, but the company didn't want to pay for it. Hortonworks doesn't exist anymore, and Cloudera killed the free version of Hadoop.""I would like to see more direct integration of visualization applications."

More Apache Hadoop Cons →

"Lacks sufficient documentation and particularly in Spanish.""IBM Db2 Warehouse needs to improve its interface.""The biggest problems we have is when the backup solution is failing or slow and we run out of log space, which has happened probably a couple of times in the last four years.""The areas of the solution that is needing the most improvement are separating compute from storage, elasticity, which means scaling up and then retracting.""The biggest challenge anyone could have with Db2 Warehouse is their references or online resources and documentation. They are very, very, very limited on the web.""In terms of improvement, IBM Db2 Warehouse should be more scalable.""There should be more material available for training and training should be free."

More IBM Db2 Warehouse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do take into consider that data storage and compute capacity scale differently and hence purchasing a "boxed" / 'all-in-one" solution (software and hardware) might not be the best idea."
  • "​There are no licensing costs involved, hence money is saved on the software infrastructure​."
  • "This is a low cost and powerful solution."
  • "The price of Apache Hadoop could be less expensive."
  • "If my company can use the cloud version of Apache Hadoop, particularly the cloud storage feature, it would be easier and would cost less because an on-premises deployment has a higher cost during storage, for example, though I don't know exactly how much Apache Hadoop costs."
  • "We don't directly pay for it. Our clients pay for it, and they usually don't complain about the price. So, it is probably acceptable."
  • "The price could be better. Hortonworks no longer exists, and Cloudera killed the free version of Hadoop."
  • "We just use the free version."
  • More Apache Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In a traditional on-prem database, in a data warehouse, the solution is probably on the expensive side."
  • More IBM Db2 Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Tools like Apache Hadoop are knowledge-intensive in nature. Unlike other tools in the market currently, we cannot understand knowledge-intensive products straight away. To use Apache Hadoop, a person… more »
    Top Answer:The standout feature of IBM Db2 Warehouse, which is particularly valuable for large enterprises, is its ability to handle big data.
    Top Answer:Db2 is a very expensive database. In comparison to Oracle, for example, where the cost depends on the size of the implementation. For an enterprise database, the cost is mid-range.
    Top Answer:IBM Db2 Warehouse needs to improve its interface.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    2,630
    Comparisons
    2,223
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    532
    Rating
    8.0
    14th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    973
    Comparisons
    521
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    363
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InfoSphere Warehouse, IBM InfoSphere Warehouse
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    The Apache Hadoop project develops open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing. The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage. Rather than rely on hardware to deliver high-availability, the library itself is designed to detect and handle failures at the application layer, so delivering a highly-available service on top of a cluster of computers, each of which may be prone to failures.
    InfoSphere Warehouse is a suite of products that combines the strength of DB2 with a data warehousing infrastructure from IBM. You can use InfoSphere Warehouse to build a complete data warehousing solution that includes a highly scalable relational database, data access capabilities, and front-end analysis tools.
    Sample Customers
    Amazon, Adobe, eBay, Facebook, Google, Hulu, IBM, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Spotify, AOL, Twitter, University of Maryland, Yahoo!, Cornell University Web Lab
    Alameda County Social Services Agency, Sui Southern Gas Company Limited
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Hospitality Company6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    University6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization52%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Insurance Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise37%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Hadoop vs. IBM Db2 Warehouse
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Hadoop vs. IBM Db2 Warehouse and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Hadoop is ranked 5th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while IBM Db2 Warehouse is ranked 14th in Data Warehouse with 8 reviews. Apache Hadoop is rated 7.8, while IBM Db2 Warehouse is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apache Hadoop writes "A file system for data collection that contains needed information and files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Db2 Warehouse writes "Useful for ETL process and has good documentation ". Apache Hadoop is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, Snowflake and Dremio, whereas IBM Db2 Warehouse is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, IBM Db2 Warehouse on Cloud and BigQuery. See our Apache Hadoop vs. IBM Db2 Warehouse report.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.