We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring and CA CEM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 14 reviews while CA CEM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while CA CEM [EOL] is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring writes "End-to-end visibility, feature-rich, but the support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA CEM [EOL] writes "It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs". AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is most compared with Elastic Observability, New Relic and AWS X-Ray, whereas CA CEM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.