Compare AppGate vs. Pulse Policy Secure

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AppGate Logo
3,056 views|2,441 comparisons
Pulse Policy Secure Logo
136 views|99 comparisons
Ranking
8th
Views
3,056
Comparisons
2,441
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
Views
136
Comparisons
99
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Cryptzone AppGate
Learn
Cyxtera Technologies
Pulse Secure
Video Not Available
Overview

AppGate enables organizations to adopt a Software-Defined Perimeter approach for granular security control. AppGate makes the application/server infrastructure effectively “invisible.” It then provides users with access to authorized resources only, verifying user context and attributes — including device posture and identity — before granting access to an application. Once the user logs out, the secure tunnel disappears. Additionally, when a user’s context changes – such as moving from a corporate to a public network, additional security requirements (such as multi-factor authentication) can be enforced, or access can be denied. All controlled by a simple policy.

Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) is a next-gen NAC that enables organizations to gain complete visibility, understand their security posture, and enforce roles-based access and endpoint security policy for network user, guest and IoT devices. Leveraging core network, mobile and security infrastructure integrations, Pulse NAC solution can streamline endpoint compliance and remediation, BYOD onboarding and IoT security, as well as automate threat response to mitigate malware, rogue device, unauthorized access and data leakage risks.

Pulse Policy Secure is a full featured NAC that has been designed for easy deployment, convenient scalability and rapid time-to-value. Through configuration and policy creation wizards, PPS empowers administrators to simply define, implement and enforce policy with the flexibility to enable endpoint discovery, monitoring or alerting or invoke strong enforcement. Organizations gain Zero Trust access capabilities using contextual data such as user, role, device, security posture, location and behavior. Enterprises can expand coverage employing PPS extensive management, robust interoperability, high-performance appliance capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about AppGate
Learn more about Pulse Policy Secure
Sample Customers
Brainspace, PSE S.A., Redcats, Asprea, Aintree University Hospitals (NHS)Entegrus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government11%
Media Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AppGate is ranked 8th in Network Access Control while Pulse Policy Secure is ranked 14th in Network Access Control. AppGate is rated 0.0, while Pulse Policy Secure is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AppGate is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco IOS SSL VPN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Pulse Policy Secure is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiNAC, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Genian NAC.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.