ArcSight Analytics vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
308 views|149 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,174 views|1,996 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: What SOC product do you recommend?
Answer: I haven't used these big-name ones like Splunk etc. but I feel they're overpriced. I think they charge an arm and a leg for each module. The ROI justification is not there. Why not try a cheaper and robust alternative like Elasticsearch?
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability.""ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.""The most valuable feature is the log monitoring.""This solution allows us to identify connections for all users.""The solution is easy to implement.""ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring.""The correlation engine is good.""One of the most valuable features is the alerts."

More ArcSight Analytics Pros →

"The QNI feature is the one I am very interested in, and I have also been interested in Watson. From the log analysis and the security perspective, we are able to dive deep into any of the logs and anomalies.""There are more than 120 extensions in QRadar, which are easy to install and configure. These can improve your analysis of events.""It saves a lot of time. We integrate the customer's firewall with all their networking devices.""I think it's a very stable product that provides much more visibility than the other product.""Providing real-time visibility for threat detection and prioritization - QRadar SIEM provides contextual and actionable surveillance across the entire IT infrastructure.""I have found IBM QRadar to be scalable.""I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable.""I have used IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics in a Cloud Pak on Amazon, and there it runs on top of it and is easy to assess. Additionally, I have installed processes and characters."

More IBM Security QRadar Pros →

Cons
"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved.""[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training.""The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use.""Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked.""It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow.""I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time.""The customer service could be improved, and additional integrations with other APIs could be added.""I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."

More ArcSight Analytics Cons →

"It doesn't have a SOAR system by default. You need to purchase it additionally, which is the main problem with QRadar.""The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging.""The Indian tech support is not helpful.""The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling.""I need a solution which will send alerts in the event of any behavior.""Search capability and indexing still lag behind competitors. We also need to see improved rule based access controls and rule/event tuning.""It would be better if it were more stable and more secure. The price for maintenance could be better. It's too high. In the next release, I think they should focus on the price and the operation.""IBM Qradar could improve the reporting. The tool is not designed to report. It's a great operational monitoring tool. You put it on a screen and you watch it. If you want to have analytics out of it, that's a whole different story. You're going to need more people and tools. What should be added is reporting and integration into Power BI, into some capability that produces analytical reports from the source data. IBM does not seem to care to add these features."

More IBM Security QRadar Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
  • "The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
  • "In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
  • "It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
  • "This solution is expensive."
  • "My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
  • More ArcSight Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "found other solutions, with more features at the same cost or less. You don’t have to leave the Gartner Magic Quadrant to beat their price."
  • "Most of the time, it is easier and cheaper to buy a new product or the QRadar box."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "Go through a vulnerability assessment review for price breaks. A virtualized solution will also cut down on cost."
  • "It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises."
  • "The maintenance costs are high."
  • "Pricing (based on EPS) will be more accurate."
  • More IBM Security QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Vinod Shankar
    Answers from the Community
    Navin Rehnius
    Jairo Willian Pereira - PeerSpot reviewerJairo Willian Pereira
    Real User

    Apache Metron, ELK, OSSIM, Splunk and Qradar (in cost/benefit order for starters).

    Tjeerd Saijoen - PeerSpot reviewerTjeerd Saijoen
    Reseller

    I have no experience with Rapid 7 or InsightIDR. 


    IBM Qradar works great but is not easy to install. If it is running it is a great tool. Also depending on the budget, Riverbed security is a tool to consider. Costs are lower than QRadar and easier to implement. 


    Or you can use our SaaS solution with QRadar and a lot more built-in. One holistic solution for your complete IT environment.

    Jack Callaghan - PeerSpot reviewerJack Callaghan
    Real User

    @Evgeny Belenky, ​ I found Stellar to be quite intriguing. 


    I would also recommend McAFee’s new console for centralizing and coordinating a well-deployed enterprise solution.

    Ishan Kukreti - PeerSpot reviewerIshan Kukreti
    User

    COMODO MDR 

    John Stanford - PeerSpot reviewerJohn Stanford
    Real User

    Disclaimer: ICE Consulting offers SOC as a Service to our Clients.


    For SOC Tools we use Securonix and other in-house developed solutions. Securonix provides an all in one package (SIEM, UEBS, & NTA) that we believe is competitively priced for the Small to Mid Market. Their Customer Service seems better than most and they are always highly rated in the Gartner MQ reports. Set-up is not difficult, but is time consuming for the first time, afterwards each client deployment we have added has seemed to get easier and quicker.


    Please contact several vendors and ask for demos, talk with the vendor engineers to ensure the solution will workfor your needs... We evaluated Rapid7, AlienVault (ATT Cybersecurity), QRadar, LogRythm, and Securonix before deciding on Securonix. 


    Also take your time in evaluating and re-evaluating the products, I took us about about 18 months and over $30K of working with what was utimately the wrong product for us, before moving to Securonix.


    Make sure training for the use of the service is included.  We have been able to provide entensive training to out team through the vendor and would not have been able to get out SOC offering off the ground without it.


    Good Luck!

    Ishan Kukreti - PeerSpot reviewerIshan Kukreti
    User

    COMODO SOC covers your entire network and also your email. It is very easy to deploy and is very effective for reports. 

    Ishan Kukreti - PeerSpot reviewerIshan Kukreti
    User

    I prefer the COMODO SOC solution because it is a very good and easy to deploy product.

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
    Top Answer:ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
    Top Answer:My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
    Top Answer:It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
    Top Answer:The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
    Ranking
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    315
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    3,174
    Comparisons
    1,996
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
    IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
    Learn More
    Overview

    ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

    IBM Security QRadar is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.

    IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats. 

    IBM QRadar Log Manager

    To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.

    Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:

    • Data processing and capture on any security event
    • Disaster recovery options and high availability 
    • Scalability for large enterprises
    • SoftLayer cloud installation capability
    • Advanced threat protection

    Reviews from Real Users

    IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.

    Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."

    A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Educational Organization14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Security Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM Security QRadar
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ArcSight Analytics is ranked 17th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.