We performed a comparison between ARIS Process Governance and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Using this solution we can design our own processor governance, assign some specific technical services, and also run tests of the process to make sure it operates as we need it to."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
"The solution uses a coding language for process design that is specific only to this product. We would like to see this changed to something more universal."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
ARIS Process Governance is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "Easy to use, reliable, and simple to expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". ARIS Process Governance is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our ARIS Process Governance vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.