• Home
  • Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Federation Server

Qlik Replicate vs SAS Federation Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Qlik Logo

Qlik Replicate

Read 13 Qlik Replicate reviews
6,009 views|4,955 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo

SAS Federation Server

46 views|39 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Data Integration
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Qlik Replicate and SAS Federation Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Gabriel Araya
Great around replicating and updating records which improves performance
Replicate has improved our performance in the database source. It also has the ability to have many analytic users doing different SQLs against the... Read more →
Use SAS Federation Server?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."
  • "Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."
  • "Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."
  • "Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

    • More Qlik Replicate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?
    Top Answer:We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments.
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?
    Top Answer:Qlik Replicate is a little fuzzy sometimes as to how it's priced. It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious.
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?
    Top Answer:Qlik Replicate is used when a company wants to make some sort of universal bus, a data chain where you have a continuous feed of data flowing in from source to target. The solution helps you hook in… more »
    Read all 11 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    16th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    6,009
    Comparisons
    4,955
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    8.2
    6th
    out of 9 in Data Virtualization
    Views
    46
    Comparisons
    39
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Replicate, Qlik Replicate
    Federation Server
    Learn More
    Qlik
    SAS
    Overview

    Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support. 

    Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

    SAS Federation Server creates a virtual environment that provides a secure, business-centric view of your data. You get better performance, easier access to business information, and you also have more control over who can see what types of data – providing higher levels of information security.
    Sample Customers
    American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare
    Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano, Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Insurance Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Qlik Replicate is ranked 16th in Data Integration with 13 reviews while SAS Federation Server is ranked 6th in Data Virtualization. Qlik Replicate is rated 8.2, while SAS Federation Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Qlik Replicate writes "A highly stable solution that can be used to change data capture in legacy systems". On the other hand, Qlik Replicate is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Compose, Azure Data Factory and Fivetran, whereas SAS Federation Server is most compared with .

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.