We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Aurea CX Monitor vs. Icinga

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Auvik Logo
Read 17 Auvik reviews.
1,333 views|328 comparisons
Aurea CX Monitor Logo
134 views|112 comparisons
Icinga Logo
5,833 views|4,437 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, LogicMonitor and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: September 2021.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like.""The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device.""Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge.""The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price.""It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes.""As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced.""Its pricing is very reasonable. We had looked at other solutions where you pay based on the amount of traffic that was filtered through and analyzed. With Auvik, we pay by a billable device. We're not paying based on every single device we have. For one of the locations I have, one network element would likely be a billable device. So, every billable device has a network element, but not every network element is a billable device. If I have a location that has 50 network elements, then maybe 30 of them are billable devices. PCs, VoIP phones, and access points are monitored at no charge.""The cost for all the devices that we were billed at in my last job was about $2500 annually. It wasn't much. It has the most reasonable pricing as compared to any product out there. I can't complain. It is amazing. It allows me to bundle inside the package what I charge customers per user per month. I don't charge them per device anymore. That's not how we do things in the industry. It is per user per month. The way Auvik is charging us allows me to do it. For example, if they charge $250 for a certain number of seats, I'm just going to write the costs onto per user per month. I have a few leftover licenses to use, which allows me to go out and make some more sales and give some freebies at some shows. So, it makes me very flexible. I am very happy with it. It is billed by network devices. You could choose which billable device you want. What is really nice is that if you don't want one switch to be billable and the other one to be billable, you can do that. You just won't have the features that the billable switch has, which isn't horrible. Sometimes, you don't need that. What I'm really happy about is that Auvik doesn't force things on you and doesn't say, "You have to have all of this," and that's a great business model."

More Auvik Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"It's an open-source solution."

More Icinga Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: One of the best things about Auvik, and it's why it's one of my go-to products, are the remote access capabilities… more »
Top Answer: The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per… more »
Top Answer: The logging features could be a little bit better polished, although that aspect is relatively new. It comes in as raw… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
CX Monitor Enterprise
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Icinga
Video Not Available
Overview

Auvik is cloud-based software that simplifies and automates network monitoring and management to give you complete network visibility and control.

Designed to deploy in minutes, you’ll resolve problems faster than ever with real-time network mapping and inventory, powerful troubleshooting features, deep network traffic insights, automated config backups and restore, and more. https://www.auvik.com/get-free-trial

Aurea CX Monitor is a comprehensive IT monitoring and management solution delivering the system monitoring, root-cause analysis, and issue identification tools you need to run your business in real-time.

Icinga monitors infrastructures of all sizes with the integrated cluster system secured by SSL, Integrates with DevOps tools and uses an object based configuration or provision on users' monitoring code through the REST API. Icinga has a lightweight and extensible web interface to keep an eye on your environment and provides modules that extend the functionality of Icinga Web 2. Additionally, it offers a fully preconfigured monitoring stack or just add an external perspective.
Offer
Learn more about Auvik
Learn more about Aurea CX Monitor
Learn more about Icinga
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company17%
Healthcare Company17%
Security Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Government9%
Healthcare Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company25%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business60%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise27%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, LogicMonitor and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: September 2021.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Aurea CX Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Icinga is ranked 32nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Aurea CX Monitor is rated 0.0, while Icinga is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Icinga writes "Stable, open-source, easy to use, and checks can be run with Python code or shell scripts". Aurea CX Monitor is most compared with , whereas Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and PRTG Network Monitor.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.