• Home
  • Aurea Sonic XML Server vs. InterSystems Caché

Aurea Sonic XML Server vs InterSystems Caché comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
19th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
10
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
150
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sonic XML Server
InterSystems Cache
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
InterSystems
Overview
Information Not Available
Post-relational database for e-applications; delivers breakthrough performance for highly scalable Web applications.
Sample Customers
Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization67%
Healthcare Company15%
Computer Software Company7%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company3%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise66%
Large Enterprise28%

Aurea Sonic XML Server is ranked 19th in Non-Relational Databases while InterSystems Caché is ranked 9th in Non-Relational Databases. Aurea Sonic XML Server is rated 0.0, while InterSystems Caché is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aurea Sonic XML Server is most compared with , whereas InterSystems Caché is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.